** Wᴇʟᴄᴏᴍᴇ ᴛᴏ Vɪʙᴇs, ɪꜰ ʏᴏᴜ ᴅᴏᴡɴʟᴏᴀᴅ ᴀɴ ᴀʟʙᴜᴍ ᴛʜᴇɴ ᴘʟᴇᴀsᴇ ᴛᴀᴋᴇ ᴛʜᴇ ᴛɪᴍᴇ ᴛᴏ ᴛʜᴀɴᴋ ᴛʜᴇ ᴜᴘʟᴏᴀᴅᴇʀ, ɪᴛ ᴏɴʟʏ ᴛᴀᴋᴇs ᴀ ꜰᴇᴡ sᴇᴄᴏɴᴅs. Wᴇ ɴᴏᴡ ʜᴀᴠᴇ ᴀ ᴘᴏʟɪᴄʏ ᴏꜰ ɴᴏ ʀᴇ ᴜᴘs ᴏꜰ ᴘᴏsᴛs, sᴏ ᴅᴏɴ'ᴛ ᴀsᴋ. Wᴇ ᴡɪʟʟ ʜᴏᴡᴇᴠᴇʀ ʀᴇ ᴜᴘ Bᴏx Oꜰ Vɪʙᴇs ᴘᴏsᴛs, ɪꜰ ʏᴏᴜ ᴅɪsᴄᴏᴠᴇʀ ᴀɴ ɪɴᴀᴄᴛɪᴠᴇ ʟɪɴᴋ ** **Pʟᴇᴀsᴇ ᴄᴏᴍᴍᴇɴᴛ ᴀɴᴅ sʜᴏᴡ ʏᴏᴜʀ ᴀᴘᴘʀᴇᴄɪᴀᴛɪᴏɴ ꜰᴏʀ ᴛʜᴇ ᴜᴘʟᴏᴀᴅᴇʀs ** 4vibessite(at)proton.me, swap (at) for @

21 March 2026

1989 - The Rolling Stones Singles Collection The London Years



1989 - The Rolling Stones Singles Collection
The London Years @320



The three-disc box set Singles Collection: The London Years contains every single the Rolling Stones released during the '60s, including both the A- and B-sides. It is the first Stones compilation that tries to be comprehensive and logical -- for all their attributes, the two Hot Rocks sets and the two Big Hits collections didn't present the singles in chronological order. In essence, the previous compilations were excellent samplers, where Singles Collection tells most of the story (certain albums, like Aftermath, Beggars Banquet, and Let It Bleed, fill in the gaps left by the singles). The Rolling Stones made genuine albums -- even their early R&B/blues albums were impeccably paced -- but their singles had a power all their own, which is quite clearly illustrated by the Singles Collection. By presenting the singles in chronological order, the set takes on a relentless, exhilarating pace with each hit and neglected B-side piling on top of each other, adding a new dimension to the group; it has a power it wouldn't have had if it tried to sample from the albums. Although it cheats near the end, adding singles from the Metamorphosis outtakes collection and two singles from Sticky Fingers, this captures the essence of the '60s Stones as well as any compilation could. Casual fans might want to stick with the Hot Rocks sets, since they just have the hits, but for those that want a little bit more, the Singles Collection is absolutely essential. (AllMusic)






 



7 comments:

  1. Merci beaucoup! C'est la meilleure periode pour ce groupe. ça vieillit pas. Bravo pour ton site trés bonne musique et plein de découvertes.
    Djidji

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. yeah I would agree with you, their best stuff was in the 60's for me

      Delete
    2. Je suis ravi que le site vous plaise ! Certains pensent que rien avant « Exile on Mainstreet » n'est bon, mais je suis d'accord avec vous, les premiers morceaux sont les meilleurs.

      Delete
  2. Thank you Andy an upgrade on my version

    ReplyDelete
  3. It's all the Stones I'll ever need! Many thanks, Andy

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hey Andy;
    Thank-you! I used to have this years ago. I especially like that it includes Time Is On My Side with the Organ into. Yes I agree with Reb... the 60's Stones (Brian Jones era) were influential and trend setting.

    ReplyDelete